When it comes to Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Google’s Core Web Vitals are a make or break ranking factor. Unlike many other SEO metrics, these metrics measure the performance of a website from the user’s perspective. The Core Web Vitals update is about making websites more enjoyable, more responsive, and more snappy.
While Google’s Core Web Vitals were designed to help web developers make the world wide web a happier place for everyone, Google also uses them as a ranking metric for search engine results. This means these straightforward metrics offer the opportunity for web developers to improve a website while SEO experts have one more way to improve a website’s ranking.
Core Web Vitals establish a win-win for businesses and their visitors. We can all agree the web experience is better without delayed load times, shifting content, or other issues. It’s also awesome that optimizing your website’s Core Web Vitals can result in a tangible impact on organic visitors and your business’s conversion rates.
When a doctor checks their patient’s vitals, they get a snapshot of that person’s overall health without performing a full examination. Instead, they measure the most important indicators: temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure. This is similar to how Google’s Core Web Vitals give you a sneak peek of your website’s usability health and page experience.
Through three indicating factors, Core Web Vitals allow web developers and site owners to decide where updates need to be applied first.
While your health vitals include heart rate, temperature, and blood pressure, a website’s Core Vitals include:
If you read these terms and felt suddenly overwhelmed, don’t worry. These, like so many other technical SEO and web development terms, are less complicated than they sound. And we’ll explain each in-depth for you.
Google realized that many top-ranking websites didn’t provide an optimal experience for visitors–despite providing relevant content. It was difficult to quantify the usability of a website from a visitor’s perspective with the existing metrics. So, Google made it a mission to fix both.
Was the web experience really that bad? Yes and no. When Google first rolled out their Core Web Vitals, 98% of top-ranking sites did not pass Core Web Vital standards. Here’s an example of a website that took a huge hit in ranking positions after the Page Experience update went live in June 2021.
It’s important to remember that Google wants to improve the overall health of the web ecosystem. The internet is built for users, after all.
In addition to elevating and setting a standard to measure the biggest complaints among users, it’s important to note that other issues always arise. One is that web development techniques have become extremely diverse. And having metrics for the user experience accounts for all the many ways to architect a website.
Google views these metrics as a way to initiate a sea-change for the entirety of the industry. According to Annie Sullivan with Google’s Core Web Vitals program, by emphasizing the user experience in relation to load time, third-party content management systems like WordPress, Shopify, BigCommerce will be motivated to improve their products. This benefits small businesses, users, and web innovation.
Core Web Vitals are defined by three main metrics: LCP, CLS, and FID. These aspects of a website all impact how long a user interacts with a website.
By focusing on these issues, web developers can greatly improve the user experience. By targeting these metrics, SEO experts can better optimize websites.
LCP is the render time for the biggest content element visible to the user–this differs from First Content Paint (FCP). The LCP does not count any elements that fall below the “fold line.” This is to say that if the user has to scroll to see it, it won’t count against your LCP.
So what may be identified as a website’s LCP? Most often your LCP is the page’s featured image or <h1> tag.
However, it could also be:
When it comes to speed, seconds matter when it comes to your user’s experience. Seconds can feel like ages to a user anxiously waiting for content they’re interested in to load. So, for your LCP, ideally, you want your LCP to be under 2.5 seconds.
The amount of time for the most important elements to load can result in users backing out. This can cause your bounce rate to balloon. Furthermore, if users are waiting too long for elements to load, you could be losing sales.
Have you ever been reading an article and lost your place because the text shifted on the browser? This is likely because an image or video took some time to load somewhere above, leading to poor visual stability. CLS quantifies the number of these shifts.
CLS can also result in miss-clicks. For example, while logging into a website, if the login button shifts you may wind up clicking “forgot my password.” For obvious reasons, this is frustrating.
Some of the most common elements that result in high CLS include:
You want your CLS to be under .1 seconds.
The last thing you want is visitors to your website feeling frustrated. When a page shifts while in use, visitors wind up with a negative impression of your website and business.
FID measures the amount of time it takes for a user to be able to interact with elements, such as entry fields on a page. FID also takes into account contingent entry fields or delays between when you press play and when a video begins.
This web vital was frightening for many web developers because many third-party widgets lag–and most devs use these tools to reduce laborious and cumbersome tasks. However, this metric will motivate CMS and widget developers to up their game.
You will notice that many tools, such as PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse use the phrases “Time to Interactive” and “Total Blocking Time.” These often stand in place for FID since some web pages do not have interaction opportunities.
Input interactions are any actions on your website that allow the user to interact with and the site needs to respond to. These include:
You want your FID to be under 100 milliseconds.
Poor FID can lead to a major loss in conversions since many users will back out of a sales funnel due to wait times (and having more time to rethink their purchase).
Core Web Vitals are a ranking metric for Google search results. And while there are over 200 factors that determine how your page will rank, poor Web Vitals metrics can have a cumulative negative effect on your website’s performance.
Additionally, Google representatives have announced that Web Vitals will continue to play a role in how the search engine ranks websites for years to come. And we can expect these metrics to become even more important as they fine-tune and refine the search engine.
Additionally, an e-commerce website is similar to a brick-and-mortar business in that a user’s first impression matters. If you were to talk into a business and not be greeted or feel confused by the layout, you would likely turn and leave.
The same is true with the eCommerce experience. When visitors leave, you’re impacting your visitor’s time-on-page and your bounce rate. We have no doubt that improving your website’s SEO through its Web Vital metrics will increase your conversions.
The easiest way to audit your website’s core vitals is to perform a free SEO audit to identify issues lowering your website’s score through field data metrics. Then fix these problems.
Your Core Web Vital’s Grading Scale
However, you can also check your website’s CWVs using a few different approaches.
Or, hold Crtl + Shift + C. Then select “i